Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
922
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 15:06:32 -
[1] - Quote
Logoffsky is not cool bro. You can always dock and logoff you know? It should never be a viable tactic to misuse the logoff mechanic as a way to avoid an engagement in space.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
926
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 15:37:19 -
[2] - Quote
Zerbyl wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Zerbyl wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Logoffsky is not cool bro. You can always dock and logoff you know? It should never be a viable tactic to misuse the logoff mechanic as a way to avoid an engagement in space. Its not about avoiding engagement, its that some one is preventing u from safe logging and doesnt get anything from it? When some one is around to be able to target you, you are by definition not safe. If some is within target range of me that means im not safe? c'mon Yes, he could target you and shoot you. Just dock and then log... problem solved
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
926
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 16:01:55 -
[3] - Quote
Zerbyl wrote:Ur missing the point here, why is there even safe logging if u just want everyone to dock and logg there? Point is, that someone is preveting u from safelogging without getting any timer or anything from it. Shooting, poiting and everthing else gives timers.
And in fact i know that code uses this in theyr advantege. I don't think i'm missing the point at all. I think it's pretty obvious to everyone that you want to save your freighter or something similar with logoffsky, because you failed to prepare yourself when planing your route and required support fleet.
You try to misuse a mechanic that is there to logoff from the game and not to save your ship. It's implemented the way it is now to prevent exactly what you try to do with it.
P.S. A mining permit also nerver hurts.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
926
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 16:46:26 -
[4] - Quote
Zerbyl wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Zerbyl wrote:In my mind mechanics behind safe logging is broken. Fact that u cant safe log when some one is locking u prevents from safe logging even if u are doing everything else right.
Discussion please Someone got his freight bumped  Yes i got my freighter bumbed... six f'**ckg hours, knowing that all they want is that i logg off, so ill lose skill based bonuses...  So instead of using this 6h to think about how to save your freighter, which is totaly possible if you actually use some effort to protect your stuff, you come to the forums and say "Halp! CCP give me a instant escape button!".
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
926
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 17:07:16 -
[5] - Quote
No one would expect the freighter to be save without support in any other kind of space in EVE. But this is true for highsec too. So if you plan to move your unarmed ship completely solo, not even with an alt as support, you made wrong assumptions about the risk involved. You can ignore the risk if it is too low anyway and say it just bad luck if they get me, but that does not usually involves whining in the forums and demanding game changes.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
929
|
Posted - 2015.04.06 17:16:13 -
[6] - Quote
Zerbyl wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:No one would expect the freighter to be save without support in any other kind of space in EVE. But this is true for highsec too. So if you plan to move your unarmed ship completely solo, not even with an alt as support, you made wrong assumptions about the risk involved. You can ignore the risk if it is too low anyway and say it just bad luck if they get me, but that does not usually involves whining in the forums and demanding game changes. This isnt about my freighter or anything that i have/havent done. This whole thread exists because you want to logoffsky your freighter, so i think it is.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
938
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 08:01:19 -
[7] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Eve Solecist wrote:What's the point of this thread besides it being a rant ... ... about how you are FORCED ... ... WITH A GUN ... ... to stay logged in? Actually, you aren't being forced by a gun, you're being forced by being targeted, which is very much different and requires no gun. Personally I think the onus should be on the aggressor to make an actual aggressive move to keep someone logged in. Of course that would be adding a small amount of challenge, and we know most aggressors don't like that. But that's how it actually works. He can logoff at any time, the ship will disappear after some time if no one is shooting him. The only thing he can't do is to use the safe logoff function, because he was not in safety.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
|
|